20210713, 11:05  #23 
Jun 2012
C83_{16} Posts 
C191_4788_12590
Code:
p74 factor: 93655381047573915286094344777460544361560556243301176853766361319415593927 p117 factor: 146522181514848744247047851450982589541255333928818996022766288145219096626768565286336041561355044227576265131956847 
20210719, 06:04  #24 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
19·263 Posts 
C201_3366_2226 has built a matrix 43M at TD 120.
It'll take 56 weeks to solve. 
20210728, 14:35  #25 
Jun 2012
3,203 Posts 
C213_M31_k58 Factored
Code:
prp88 factor: 1552893704046856934673246902021521232580626205434880896791780569565927923246340438343849 prp125 factor: 64826999409970233646517742117530348992467048368592094393267598807921659274098343259072688331621535830620851667997450604462211 
20210813, 04:30  #26  
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
19×263 Posts 
Quote:
A series of random reboots prompted me to try to figure out the instability; since there were a dozen or so reboots while the matrix was running, I have low confidence in the correctness of the 40%complete calculation. So, rather than try to get a 4channel 4x4 + 2x8 = 32GB configuration working, I'm going to move the data to another machine and start the matrix over. The other machine is a bit slower, so it'll be 6 weeks (hopefully?) from now for factors. 

20210813, 06:53  #27 
Jul 2003
So Cal
7×313 Posts 

20210813, 15:16  #28 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
19·263 Posts 
I accept! Go for it. I'll shift to poly select on the c220 from Aliquot 4788.

20210815, 10:23  #29 
Jul 2003
So Cal
7·313 Posts 
C201_3366_2226 is done and posted.

20210905, 21:12  #30 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
2·3·5·11·29 Posts 
I can finish 8p3_930M octic

20210909, 18:19  #31 
Jun 2012
C83_{16} Posts 
AS 3366:i2233
I have finished test sieving the AS job C201_3366_2233. I even tried varying rlim/alim to 200M/250M and 250M/200M but the parameters listed below worked best.
Code:
n: 131059381160969890473184300494609882864431978456309837392557442177052630795870868382351497139096300267026719895523089453234540027837272339241326353564822104741922921032481193771448768282517397405699723 skew: 272726903.707 lss: 0 c0: 3419281390608846968778268338419370567158813629362 c1: 258854464423997783647767547760287821024753 c2: 767236135068739573740612500186036 c3: 3287457778282621690365713 c4: 10211483437143594 c5: 12458880 Y0: 575476667446322731628680355694195898900 Y1: 2846500471772809349499599 rlim: 225000000 alim: 225000000 lpbr: 33 lpba: 33 mfbr: 66 mfba: 96 rlambda: 2.8 alambda: 3.6 Test sieving on the algebraic side with Q in blocks of 10k: Code:
Q(M) Yield # of spec_Q Corrected Yield 50 28685 556 29103 100 31706 534 32233 150 32209 536 31919 200 34102 555 32147 250 31112 519 31001 300 33201 575 29581 350 29045 526 28068 850M relations? Less? 850M relations equates to a Qrange of 50325M. Also the yield > 3.0 for much of the sieving range and is arguably too high, but the ideal of running a GNFS 201 job at lpba/r = 32 was not appealing. Open to any suggested improvements. Last fiddled with by swellman on 20210909 at 18:20 
20210909, 21:06  #32 
"Curtis"
Feb 2005
Riverside, CA
19×263 Posts 
I'd guess 875900M relations to get a nice matrix; perhaps 50330M and try filtering before deciding how many more Q?
Yield of almost3.0 sounds quite nice! 
20210914, 05:58  #33 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
22542_{8} Posts 
Fib(1409) is done
Code:
Mon Sep 13 21:49:33 2021 p64 factor: 1645314853783969974409864778570205738354678434910357950092999577 p161 cofactor: 1263615066...54657241 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
2021 “small” 15e post processing reservations and results  swellman  NFS@Home  238  20211021 23:20 
2021 15e post processing reservations and results  swellman  NFS@Home  174  20211019 06:12 
2021 14d post processing reservations and results  swellman  NFS@Home  242  20211016 21:48 
2019 14e post processing reservations and results  swellman  NFS@Home  862  20191231 10:51 
2019 15e post processing reservations and results  swellman  NFS@Home  220  20191228 16:40 